Customer Rating: 



Summary: Mediocre since Weider Publishing took over
Comment: I have had a subscription to MH for several years. I noticed a format change awhile back and the magazine seemed to have eliminated some of the well-written, well-thought out, and diverse articles, while adding shorter "eye candy" type articles along tidbits ala
USA Today sidebars. The mag seems to me more about style that it does about substance these days.
Some of the articles seem poorly researched and lack depth. For example, this month's issue had an apology in response to a letter to the editor, for an article last month that had numerous inaccuracies. The author indicated that he had relied only on one source for the article, and he didn't bother to verify the only source he used.
Some listless photo "articles" have been added(the one this month has 4 photos of unrelated events, taken by the same photographer). Prior months have had photos of blankets made by Mujahadin during the Soviet-Afgan War (which had English wording on them, oddly) and propaganda cartoons drawn by Dr. Suess during WWII. These don't add much value for a military history mag and seem to be wasteful filler material. Makes you wonder what you are paying for in your subscription fee.
I still enjoy the mag, but about half as much as I used to.
Weider publishing has taken over the magazine and the slide seems to correspond to their makeover. The Weiders made there fortune in marketing fitness and bodybuilding products. I wish they had stuck to that instead of compromising a once outstanding magazine.